The short answer. Not lawfully. INTERPOL's data rules say Red Notices "may not be published for offences relating to private matters and for offences originating from a violation of laws or regulations of an administrative nature or deriving from private disputes," unless the conduct is aimed at a serious crime or linked to organised crime. An unpaid loan, a bounced cheque or a broken contract is a civil matter. The problem is that in some countries the same facts are charged as fraud — and a fraud charge can carry a notice through the door.
The most common Red Notice story begins with a loan, a lease or an invoice — not with a crime.
The rule
Article 83 of INTERPOL’s Rules on the Processing of Data limits Red Notices to serious ordinary-law crimes and excludes, in the words the Commission for the Control of INTERPOL’s Files quotes in its own decisions, “offences relating to private matters” and offences “deriving from private disputes”. A debt is the paradigm private matter: the remedy is a civil claim and enforcement against assets, not an international request for arrest. The penalty threshold does the rest — a maximum of at least two years’ imprisonment.
How a debt becomes a crime
Three routes. In some legal systems a creditor’s complaint opens a criminal file for “fraud” without any court testing whether the debtor ever intended to deceive. In others, commercial acts are crimes in themselves — the United Arab Emirates only decriminalised the dishonour of a cheque for insufficient funds on 2 January 2022, leaving forged cheques and deliberate non-payment criminal. And between business partners, money owed is recast as money “embezzled”. Each route produces a warrant; each warrant can become a notice request that, on its face, reads as an ordinary-law crime.
The label on the warrant is not the test. The test is whether the thing underneath it is a debt.
What the Commission looks at
Because it cannot retry the facts, the Commission reads the documents around them: the loan agreement, the invoices, the civil proceedings — and, above all, the absence of anything that distinguishes the case from an ordinary commercial default: no forged document, no fictitious counterparty, no disappearance with the money. Where a civil court has dealt with the same facts, or the “victim” is the counterparty in a commercial claim, the notice fails Article 83 whatever its name. Can a Red Notice be used in a private dispute? sets out the same test from the other side.
The scale of the problem
INTERPOL’s own numbers show how much reaches its door: 2,550 Red Notices and diffusions refused or cancelled in 2025, and 60% of the data the Commission examined in 2024 found non-compliant. The person who owes money and the person who stole it look identical in a Red Notice; only the file, built on the rules, tells them apart.
Related
- Can a Red Notice be used in a private dispute?
- Which INTERPOL rules get a Red Notice deleted?
- What is a Silver Notice, and why does it matter?
- INTERPOL's Rules on the Processing of Data, Article 83 — interpol.int
- CCF Requests Chamber, decision excerpt no. 9 of 2019, quoting Article 83 on private matters — interpol.int
- Afridi & Angell, 'The dishonour of a cheque for insufficient funds will no longer be a crime in the UAE after 2 January 2022' — Federal Decree-Law No. 14 of 2020 — afridi-angell.com
- INTERPOL — notice statistics, December 2025: refusals and cancellations by ground, 2017–2025 (Compliance and review, — interpol.int
- CCF Annual Activity Report 2024 — interpol.int
Looking forward to any questions or comments that you may have! My goal is to help you, and your questions and comments are answered within one working day. And if you are somewhere in this story yourself: the assessment is free.
Ask a question or comment