The short answer. Since 26 March 2026, every request to the Commission for the Control of INTERPOL's Files goes through its online portal, and a correction or deletion request must make its entire case in a summary of arguments not exceeding ten pages, supported by at most twenty appendices, each listed and referenced. The rule is Rule 30(8) of the CCF's Operating Rules.
If you know one thing about challenging a Red Notice in 2026, make it this: the argument no longer wins by weight.
What changed in March 2026
The Commission’s own notice reads: “As of 10:00 CET on Thursday 26 March 2026, all requests to the CCF must be submitted via the new dedicated, secure online portal.” Inside it, the applicant guide is precise. A deletion request is “a summary of arguments, not exceeding 10 pages in length, in accordance with Rule 30(8)”; submitters “may upload a maximum of 20 appendices, and they shall be clearly listed and referenced”. Documents must be legible and upright; video and audio are not accepted; everything must be in Arabic, English, French or Spanish.
Why compression is the real test
The format tightened just as demand peaked. The CCF’s caseload has never been higher, and every matter, however tangled, now argues inside the same ten pages.
Requests to the CCF by year · *derived from CCF-stated growth rates · †2024 counts admissible requests only — its highest year on record. Full dataset on the CCF Tracker.
Compression is harder than length. Distilling a multi-year, multi-jurisdiction matter — the kind behind most Red Notices — into ten airtight pages means choosing the twenty exhibits that prove every sentence and discarding the hundreds that do not. Padding is no longer a vice; it is impossible.
What the ten pages must contain
A correction or deletion request must identify the rules the data allegedly breaches — the short list here — and confine itself to three things: a factual outline, legal argument mapped to those rules, and a clear statement of what is asked. Each appendix is numbered, labelled and cited in the text.
And if you lose: the revision squeeze
An application to revise a decision is tighter still. Under Article 42 of the Statute it must rest on “the discovery of a fact which would probably have led to a different conclusion,” filed “within six months after the discovery of the fact” — again in a ten-page summary at most.
Who this favours
Not the applicant with the thickest file, and not the adviser who bills by the page. The rules have made rigour structural: the request that wins is the one whose every claim is proven inside the limit. That is bad news for volume — and no news at all for anyone who works this way already.
Related
- Which INTERPOL rules get a Red Notice deleted?
- How long does Red Notice deletion take?
- Do I need a lawyer to challenge a Red Notice?
- CCF — How to submit a request; the portal, mandatory since 26 March 2026 — interpol.int
- CCF Portal User Guide for Applicants, sections 3.2, 10.2 and 10.3 — interpol.int
- Operating Rules of the CCF, Rule 30(8) — interpol.int
- Statute of the CCF, Article 42 on revision — interpol.int
- CCF Annual Activity Report 2024 — interpol.int
Looking forward to any questions or comments that you may have! My goal is to help you, and your questions and comments are answered within one working day. And if you are somewhere in this story yourself: the assessment is free.
Ask a question or comment