The short answer. It depends on whether an extract is public. "Most Notices are for police use only and are not available to the public," INTERPOL says; an extract appears on its website only at the requesting country's request. A bank or employer cannot query INTERPOL's police databases. But a public extract is copied into the commercial screening databases banks use — which combine "sanction, watch, regulatory and law enforcement lists" with adverse media — and a copy, unlike the notice, is not deleted when INTERPOL deletes.
Two questions hide inside this one: who sees the notice, and who sees its shadow.
Who can see the notice itself
Police. A Red Notice circulates through INTERPOL’s secure network to the 196 member countries’ bureaus and the officers they authorise — border posts above all. No bank, employer or journalist has access to that system. A diffusion is never visible outside it at all. For the majority of notices, which have no public extract, the honest answer is no — unless the police tell them.
Who can see the extract
Everyone, if the requesting country asked INTERPOL to publish one: name, photograph, the charge and the country. From that moment the extract is public, indexed by search engines and harvested by data vendors. The screening data that “the world’s largest financial institutions and companies” use is built from this material — law-enforcement lists plus “structured and unstructured adverse media”, with a category labelled “Absconder or Fugitive”. A compliance analyst opening an account, an employer’s background check, a counterparty’s due diligence: each runs your name against that data.
INTERPOL publishes an extract once. The screening industry republishes it every time your name is typed.
What a flag does — and what the rules say it should do
The Financial Action Task Force has been clear since 2014: the standards “only require financial institutions to terminate customer relationships, on a case-by-case basis, where the money laundering and terrorist financing risks cannot be mitigated” — not wholesale. In practice many banks do not read past the flag. The response that works is documentary: a written reply to compliance questions, the court documents that explain the notice, and — once you have it — the Commission’s deletion decision.
After deletion
Here is the trap. When the Commission for the Control of INTERPOL’s Files orders deletion, INTERPOL removes its data and tells member countries to update theirs. It cannot instruct a data vendor to purge a copy made in 2021. Screening databases update from their own sources on their own schedules; a news report quoting the extract may live for years. So a deletion is followed by housekeeping: a request to each screening provider to remove or annotate the record, decision attached, and the same letter to any bank that closed an account. Does INTERPOL tell you when a Red Notice is deleted? explains why the decision letter is the one to keep.
Related
- What is a Silver Notice, and why does it matter?
- How do I find out if I have a Red Notice?
- Does INTERPOL tell you when a Red Notice is deleted?
- INTERPOL — About Notices — interpol.int
- INTERPOL — View Red Notices, the public extracts — interpol.int
- LSEG World-Check, special interest categories fact sheet — law-enforcement lists, adverse media and the 'Absconder or Fugitive' category — lseg.com
- FATF, 'FATF clarifies risk-based approach: case-by-case, not wholesale de-risking', 23 October 2014 — fatf-gafi.org
- INTERPOL — Notices and Diffusions Task Force, compliance and review; notification of deletions — interpol.int
Looking forward to any questions or comments that you may have! My goal is to help you, and your questions and comments are answered within one working day. And if you are somewhere in this story yourself: the assessment is free.
Ask a question or comment